Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet,  
AuthorPost
jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
Does anyone have any Nikon PC lenses ? 
Have you used them?. 

What is the difference between the older PC version and the newer PC-E version.


I know that  Peter Lo has the Nikon PC-E 24mm f3.5.  Very nice but probably not something I would like to shell out for even though it is obviously the current state of the art from Nikon.

How equivalent to a proper swing/tilt effect found on a 5x4 camera ?
 


Gilbert Sandberg

 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 196
Status: 
Offline
JK,
The PC-E lenses are designed with electric F control, to complement cameras like the D3 and later.
To use the PC-E lens woth most older cameras tricks are needed. ( some beyond what you can read in the lens manual).
 I own an older 28mm PC and have used the 24 PC-E lens.
The tilt/swing is obviously not as flexible like a true 4x5 camera, if only the relation of tilt and swing is fixed , but can be rotated 90 deg by a service tech.
Regards, Gilbert

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
Thanks for the info Gilbert.
I would love to try out the 24 PC-E but it seems like an expensive purchase for a try out.

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
JK-

Look for the old versions on ebay or even B&H used department... Less than half the price of the new ones and some of us like the way they shift from portrait to landscape better than the new versions.

The pc is incredible for any architectural shots. It's just amazing how you can make better photos. I wasn't a believer until I worked with a guy who really knew what he was doing; I thought I could use the 24-70 and then correct in photoshop and match him....FAIL

I understand that Canon has leapfrogged Nikon recently by adding independent tilt and shift, though I must admit, I haven't gotten my head around how you would use that :-)

Best results always come from a good tripod with a good level :-)

Rent one and go shoot some interiors and exterior shots...you will never go back.

Tom

PS - the older ones are all manual

Doug

 

Joined: Mon Apr 9th, 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Thanks JK

I've always loved camera movements, but went off the boil with view camera photography around the time of the D1. Unfortunately PC lenses on digital were never satisfactory (until now) due to the high cost of even half decent FF resolution

Perhaps the purchase of a D800 and a PC lens is on the horizon

Gilbert Sandberg

 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 196
Status: 
Offline
JK,
I would recommend borrowing or renting a PC-E lens to try it.

A word of warning for the younger ones among us.
Older PC lenses (upto the 85 2.8 Micro-D) have full manual control over F stops, so yo have to shut it by hand for each shot. (this is what the PC-E series remedies)
Also: the 24 PC-E is (physically) the largest 24mm lens I have ever seen.
I agree with Tom: useless without plenty of patience, a tripod and spirit level (or D4).
Regards, Gilbert

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
Oh dear I feel some temptation for that 24mm PC-E but as I have just said that I have finished my lens collection.
Maybe I could sneak one extra item in if I go to Vietnam and Cambodia via Hong Kong. :-)

Renting is not a good option here in Spain as there are no suitable rental agencies close by. I could probably offer a better service and lens range than most shops.

Gilbert Sandberg

 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 196
Status: 
Offline
JK,
You may try to get into so called good books with a local dealer or Nikon Spain.
Here in Holland Nikon (NPS) visits selected (professional) dealers while bringing most nice (current) lenses.
Regards, Gilbert

Peter_LO

 

Joined: Mon Apr 23rd, 2012
Location: Preston, United Kingdom
Posts: 46
Status: 
Offline
JK,
I don't have any 4x5 but only a 6x17 with shift function. The PC-E 24 is very sharp in its "neutral" position, but once shifted it has much more CA that the Super Angulon 90, and sharpness drops drastically.

AE and auto-aperture are big pluses over non-E PC lenses, but the vignetting wide-open will fool the meter and it ends up into heavily over-exposed pictures.

That said, I can feel the temptation.:thumbsup: If renting is not a viable option, how about buying one 2nd hand? AFAIK a 2nd hand PC 35 is only USD 500 in HK.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
Peter_LO wrote: JK,
I don't have any 4x5 but only a 6x17 with shift function. The PC-E 24 is very sharp in its "neutral" position, but once shifted it has much more CA that the Super Angulon 90, and sharpness drops drastically.

AE and auto-aperture are big pluses over non-E PC lenses, but the vignetting wide-open will fool the meter and it ends up into heavily over-exposed pictures.

That said, I can feel the temptation.:thumbsup: If renting is not a viable option, how about buying one 2nd hand? AFAIK a 2nd hand PC 35 is only USD 500 in HK.
Thanks for the information on the realities of use.

I can see a Nikon 24mm f3.5 PC-E in the UK for £1150 (second hand) but I can buy one new for £1400 so the differential is not good.
I can also see second hand units of Nikon 35 PC or (my preference)  28mm PC for £300 and £400 respectively.

There is also another option I am considering which is a Kipon tilt adapter for the Fuji XPro1  which allows me to attach a Nikon lens.   This sounds best to be as the cost is only £75 delivered to my door from China.

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
But the image circle of a standard Nikon lens won't allow much tilt. You need a lens with a larger image circle for a worthwhile endeavor.

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
JK-

I strongly prefer the 24mm, but here is a great deal on a 35mm

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/800882482-USE/Nikon_35mm_f_2_8_PC_Lens.html

Tom

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote: But the image circle of a standard Nikon lens won't allow much tilt. You need a lens with a larger image circle for a worthwhile endeavor.If you use a FX lens on a DX camera (Fuji XPro1) you get a bit of extra leeway.
But Yes it would be close.
:thumbsup:

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
TomOC wrote: JK-

I strongly prefer the 24mm, but here is a great deal on a 35mm

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/800882482-USE/Nikon_35mm_f_2_8_PC_Lens.html

Tom
Agree Tom about the 24mm.

Cant buy from USA as shipping and customs make it unworkable and expensive.

Squarerigger



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
Very interesting JK. I can't seem to get my mind wrapped around the concept of this PC lens. Never seen one or it's product that I know of.o.O

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Take a look at this site Gary:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/nikon_24_pc.shtml

They take a lot of skill and experience to get the best from them but in the right hands...

Squarerigger



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Take a look at this site Gary:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/nikon_24_pc.shtml

They take a lot of skill and experience to get the best from them but in the right hands...

Thanks Robert. Very interesting lens. The article was indeed helpful and his little video went a long way to helping me understand what this lens accomplishes. Very impressive piece of engineering and very expensive!!

Gilbert Sandberg

 

Joined: Tue Apr 17th, 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 196
Status: 
Offline
Peter_io wrote:
"will fool the meter..."
The lens-manual warns against all metering with any shift or tilt, so this is not an issue.
Regards, Gilbert

Doug

 

Joined: Mon Apr 9th, 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Squarerigger wrote:
Very interesting JK. I can't seem to get my mind wrapped around the concept of this PC lens. Never seen one or it's product that I know of.o.O
The camera lens is like a video projector, projecting an image onto the sensor
Imagine photographing a flat square building - if you tilt the camera and sensor away from the perpendicular (ie the sensor is not parallel to the subject) the image of the building will be distorted

If you keep the sensor and the building parallel the building will be square, but will not fit in the frame (from ground level)

If you slide (shift) the lens around then you are able to slide around the image formed within the camera to bring the object fully back into view while the sensor and building remain parallel maintaining correct perspective

As for seeing the output of this type of optical trick, you have definitely seen it in everything from architecture right down to studio shots of good quality perfumes and kitchen wares

Squarerigger



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
Doug wrote:
Squarerigger wrote:
Very interesting JK. I can't seem to get my mind wrapped around the concept of this PC lens. Never seen one or it's product that I know of.o.O
The camera lens is like a video projector, projecting an image onto the sensor
Imagine photographing a flat square building - if you tilt the camera and sensor away from the perpendicular (ie the sensor is not parallel to the subject) the image of the building will be distorted

If you keep the sensor and the building parallel the building will be square, but will not fit in the frame (from ground level)


If you slide (shift) the lens around then you are able to slide around the image formed within the camera to bring the object fully back into view while the sensor and building remain parallel maintaining correct perspective

As for seeing the output of this type of optical trick, you have definitely seen it in everything from architecture right down to studio shots of good quality perfumes and kitchen wares



Thanks Doug, after reading Robert's link, I am sure you are correct that I have seen many uses of this lens but was unaware of the technology in use.

Peter_LO

 

Joined: Mon Apr 23rd, 2012
Location: Preston, United Kingdom
Posts: 46
Status: 
Offline
Gilbert Sandberg wrote:
The lens-manual warns against all metering with any shift or tilt, so this is not an issue.
Regards, Gilbert
True, but just can't resist to use the meter as it's there.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
This new lens from Samyang may provide a cheap entry into the PC range.
http://photorumors.com/2012/09/02/first-image-of-the-upcoming-samyang-24mm-f3-5-tilt-shift-lens/

Need to wait until after Photokina to see if it arrives and at what price.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
And here is the info from Samyang. Unfortunately no price at present.

http://photorumors.com/2012/09/07/samyang-t-s-24mm-13-5-ed-as-umc-lens-announced/

amazing50

 

Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
I have the Nikon 35mm f/2.8 PC Lens 1, which I don't use much for perspective control shots anymore as they aren't as useful on the smaller sensors. Mine looks exactly like the B&H one.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/800882482-USE/Nikon_35mm_f_2_8_PC_Lens.html

It rotates on the mount with click stops every 30 Degrees. There are white dots showing on the B&H pic.

The Samyang T-S 24mm 1:3.5 ED AS UMC lens looks interesting, especially if I go for a D800. Will hold off till the reviews are in. By the way, if you have a Hasselblad wide angle sitting around, there is a mount, the
Kipon Hasselblad V mount CF lens to Nikon F Tilt & Shift Adapter for D3X D4 D800 that runs about $350US or a plain shift adapter for about $150. Since those lenses were meant for Medium format, there is no problem with edge sharpness.

TomOC



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
JK-

Samyang just announced a 23mm PC lens. No idea if they make quality stuff or not - though their name does seem to come up quite a bit lately. No price announced yet, but I think they are generally about 1/4 to 1/3 of Nikon price?

Tom

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
Yes I posted a link to the new Samyang PC lens above..
Rumours says that the lens will be $700 in US so maybe £500-600 in UK.

Samyang produce very good quality stuff both in build and optical quality but only with manual focus so it shouldnt be a problem.  Autofocus is superfluous with PC lenses as manual focussing is a must.

That looks fine for the use it would get but if I could get the Nikon 24mm f3.5 PCE at a good price I would probably go for that.

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I can't help thinking that nobody can make a $2000 lens and sell it for $700.

The reason for using a tilt shift is to extract the last ounce of perfection from the image, can that be achieved with a lens 1/3 the price?

Even the Nikkor suffers noticeable CA at the edges according to the review I read.

Because of the construction of a DSLR it's impossible to use a true tilt shift , so it appears the PC lens is split onto two sections, an image gatherer and an image projector. The tilt shift effects happen at the intersect of the two sections of the lens and the resulting image is projected to the mirror/viewfinder or the sensor during exposure.

I think the wide angle Hass idea is a good one but I wonder how the DSLR snags are overcome, if they are? Seems to me there has to be vignetting at the more extreme tilt-shifts?

Dave Groen



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: St Louis, Missouri USA
Posts: 106
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote: Because of the construction of a DSLR it's impossible to use a true tilt shift... I'm confused. What's different about the construction of a DSLR vs. a film SLR, except that there's a sensor in the same location that the film would reside? The shutter, mirror, and mirror box are pretty much the same.

The lens bends light rays around and shoots them out the back of the lenses mount. The tilt affects the angle at which they emerge. The shift affects which portion of the image circle is used. How does what's behind the lens mount change any of this?

There's also all those extra electronics in a DSLR but they don't affect this discussion.

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I was comparing it with a true, say 5x4 technical camera.

The Nikon tilt shift lens is in two parts, the front part which does the tilting and shifting, and the 'projector' part which projects the image straight onto the sensor (or film)

A DSLR (or SLR) has a narrow port where the lens attaches, the image must be projected straight into the camera, the entire lens can't tilt or shift much or the edges of the lens mount would obstruct the sensors view of the image, it's like the body has tunnel vision.

A technical camera has none of these constraints and can tilt and shift using any standard lens. An SLR or DSLR can't, at least not more than a degree or two, and not with a standard Nikkor lens.

The PB4 bellows allows slight tilting and shifting, which can be useful but if using a standard Nikkor the image circle could be a problem, and it's only any use with either the 105mm F4.5 Bellows Nikkor or a similar lens like an EL Nikkor.

That's why the PC lenses bend in the middle.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
It should work OK on a smaller format but as you say lens coverage may be an issue. PC lenses tend to cover more.

Chromatic aberration is fairly easy to correct these days ;-)

Peter_LO

 

Joined: Mon Apr 23rd, 2012
Location: Preston, United Kingdom
Posts: 46
Status: 
Offline
I'm a happy owner of Samyang's 500/6.3 (rebranded as Kenko), so I can't wait to see the sample pic of its PC lens.

Peter_LO

 

Joined: Mon Apr 23rd, 2012
Location: Preston, United Kingdom
Posts: 46
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
The PB4 bellows allows slight tilting and shifting, which can be useful but if using a standard Nikkor the image circle could be a problem, and it's only any use with either the 105mm F4.5 Bellows Nikkor or a similar lens like an EL Nikkor.
I'm thinking about buying the 85 PC-E as well but it seems taht the bellow+EL Nikkor combo is cheaper and makes more sense.

Pity that the "longest" EL lens produced by Nikon today is only 63mm so it won't allow much shifting. o.O

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
Peter_LO wrote: Robert wrote:
The PB4 bellows allows slight tilting and shifting, which can be useful but if using a standard Nikkor the image circle could be a problem, and it's only any use with either the 105mm F4.5 Bellows Nikkor or a similar lens like an EL Nikkor.
I'm thinking about buying the 85 PC-E as well but it seems taht the bellow+EL Nikkor combo is cheaper and makes more sense.

Pity that the "longest" EL lens produced by Nikon today is only 63mm so it won't allow much shifting. o.O
Peter,
Is that new lenses or old you are referring to regarding 63mm ?.
I used to have an EL Nikkor for my SuperChromega enlarger that was 150mm f5.6  but that was nearly 15 years ago!!!

I just did a search on eBay ( using  El Nikkor lens) and got back El Nikkors 50mm, 75mm, 80mm, 105mm, 150mm and 210mm.
The lenses obviously correspond to use with film of particular sizes.

For PC use the 105mm would be great as that was designed for 6x9cms, or 150mm for 5x4, even the 75mm and 80mm lenses would work well as they were designed for 6x6 film.

Peter_LO

 

Joined: Mon Apr 23rd, 2012
Location: Preston, United Kingdom
Posts: 46
Status: 
Offline
JK,
This may be the best kept secret - even our local Nikon office says they haven't heard about that ... but Nikon is still producing EL and UV Nikkors.

In fact, the new lenses may be seen as an upgrade of the old lenses as they all have metal barrel and aperture lock.

http://www.tochigi-nikon.co.jp/products/lens/il.htm


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0931 seconds (72% database + 28% PHP). 212 queries executed.