Moderated by: chrisbet,
Now the Nikon D7200 DXAnything but the D400!  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost

Posted by Graham Whistler: Mon Mar 2nd, 2015 15:50 1st Post
https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/ci/documents/view/1/AvNk~wqEDv8S~xb~Gv9s~yJTfqMqyTz7auGHyj7~Pv9O

I was at BVE show in London last week and as it was a film and TV show there was little activity on the Nikon stand so I was able to have a good chat to them and asked about the D400? I was told they are going the 7000 route for DX and the D610 is the official upgrade for those who have a D300.



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Eric: Mon Mar 2nd, 2015 16:05 2nd Post
Graham Whistler wrote:
https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/ci/documents/view/1/AvNk~wqEDv8S~xb~Gv9s~yJTfqMqyTz7auGHyj7~Pv9O

I was at BVE show in London last week and as it was a film and TV show there was little activity on the Nikon stand so I was able to have a good chat to them and asked about the D400? I was told they are going the 7000 route for DX and the D610 is the official upgrade for those who have a D300.

Don't quite understand their logic... that the upgrade for the pro DX body is a prosumer FX body? But as we have long suspected, the D400 will be launched shortly before hell freezes over.

I personally think it's an unashamed strategy to get people to buy expensive telephoto lens rather than get a 'free' leg up from DX.

Glad I didn't buy a D7100. ;-)



____________________
Eric


Posted by Iain: Mon Mar 2nd, 2015 16:45 3rd Post
They have opened a hole that Canon have jumped in with the 7Dmk2, it's what I would be looking for in a D400 as the Nikon would have better DR.



Posted by jk: Mon Mar 2nd, 2015 17:53 4th Post
Well if you want a DX camera as we have long suspected you have to go to the D7100/7200.
The D7100 that I handled recently was very good.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by jk: Mon Mar 2nd, 2015 18:05 5th Post
More info on the D7200 announced today can be found here.
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7110233913/hands-on-with-nikon-d7200



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Ed Hutchinson: Mon Mar 2nd, 2015 22:49 6th Post
HI
I just read about the 7200 and for what it offers over the 7100 I am not even a little bit interested.
So far I am very happy with my 7100 and combined with the MB-D15 it is a nice sized and balanced unit
Besides I am sticking with tradition every time I buy a new camera a very short time later a new model comes out. So why change now



:lol:


Ed
Always drink upstream from the herd Will Rogers



____________________
R.O.C.E.D. retired old cranky extremely dangerous!



Posted by jk: Tue Mar 3rd, 2015 03:56 7th Post
I think the only real big difference between the D7100 and the D7200 is they have increased the frame buffer RAM which makes it acceptable for use by professional sports photographers.
There is a little better battery usage 1100 shots compared with 950.
Then there is the new thing of removing the AA filter as well but for all intents and purposes the camera is the same.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by jk: Tue Mar 3rd, 2015 04:45 8th Post
Definitive comparison between D7100 and D7200.

http://nikonrumors.com/2015/03/02/nikon-d7200-vs-d7100-specifications-comparison.aspx/



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by amazing50: Tue Mar 3rd, 2015 13:28 9th Post
jk wrote: I think the only real big difference between the D7100 and the D7200 is they have increased the frame buffer RAM which makes it acceptable for use by professional sports photographers.
There is a little better battery usage 1100 shots compared with 950.
Then there is the new thing of removing the AA filter as well but for all intents and purposes the camera is the same.

At least the reviewers will have it easy, just edit their D7100 work a bit.

;-)



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by Graham Whistler: Thu Mar 5th, 2015 07:37 10th Post
Then there is the new thing of removing the AA filter as well but for all intents and purposes the camera is the same.

Thanks JK I missed this in reading the Nikon info.



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by amazing50: Thu Mar 5th, 2015 10:54 11th Post
Graham Whistler wrote: Then there is the new thing of removing the AA filter as well but for all intents and purposes the camera is the same.

Thanks JK I missed this in reading the Nikon info.

Seems that the AA filter was removed for the D7100, as the DPreview states. 

" Add to that the fact that the D7100 has no OLPF filter and you'd expect nothing less than impressive performance on our resolution chart" 

Found on p15 of their review

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-d7100/15

If you don't need the larger buffer the D7100 will be a deal;~)



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1168  
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > Now the Nikon D7200 DX Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0536 seconds (69% database + 31% PHP). 89 queries executed.