Moderated by: chrisbet,
wedding photos  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost

Posted by Kathy Baker: Fri Aug 22nd, 2014 14:24 1st Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/20/dangerous-wedding-photos_n_5615286.html?page_version=legacy&view=print&comm_ref=false



Posted by MaxSouthOz: Fri Aug 22nd, 2014 17:00 2nd Post
What about the brave photographer?    ;-)



Posted by Eric: Sat Aug 23rd, 2014 04:09 3rd Post
Very impressive creativitity and execution.

It does make me wonder,with this ever increasing need for the spectacular, how many people are let down by their life afterwards. Life, and especially married life, can't always be high,flashing lights and glitz. No wonder so many marriage flounder when they discover washing up isn't accompanied by lightning and adrenaline.


Sorry, being a bit to cynical and 60+ this morning.

:devil:



____________________
Eric


Posted by richw: Sat Aug 23rd, 2014 07:47 4th Post
I agree, the marriage needs to be more important than the wedding.

Unfortunately a lot of brides who will pay for a top photographer are probably the ones who become Bridezillas.



Posted by Kathy Baker: Sat Aug 23rd, 2014 08:48 5th Post
Eric wrote: Very impressive creativitity and execution.

It does make me wonder,with this ever increasing need for the spectacular, how many people are let down by their life afterwards. Life, and especially married life, can't always be high,flashing lights and glitz. No wonder so many marriage flounder when they discover washing up isn't accompanied by lightning and adrenaline.


Sorry, being a bit to cynical and 60+ this morning.


but some times when we get older and are forced to slow down more and take our time, it is a good thing.  ;-)



Posted by Eric: Sat Aug 23rd, 2014 11:30 6th Post
Kathy Baker wrote:



but some times when we get older and are forced to slow down more and take our time, it is a good thing.  ;-)

I can tell I am getting older....I just checked the car computer and I am getting 4mpg better fuel econmy than I used to.

:lol:



____________________
Eric


Posted by jk: Sun Aug 24th, 2014 07:01 7th Post
:lol:
I bet you have a book and log when and how much fuel you put in the car!

(I have, ever since my first car in the UK). I must be really old.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Robert: Sun Aug 24th, 2014 07:34 8th Post
I have every receipt for fuel since at least 1984 I kept a log of fuel going back before that but there are gaps.

I simply write the milage on the fuel ticket and file them, when I am bored and need some excitement I enter the details into a spreadsheet.

When I had my Sinclair ZX80 I made a BASIC program which did all sorts of analysis of the data, nowadays Excel and Numbers suffice!!!

What fun.

My first Land Rover, a Series one used to get £1.00 a week of petrol, that was 3 gallons. That did all my running about for the week. Currently I usually spend at least 40 times that a week and that's if I don't go anywhere!!! LOL



____________________
Robert.



Posted by amazing50: Mon Aug 25th, 2014 21:41 9th Post
Some of this work looks like pre-made background shots and a green screen wedding shot.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by Robert: Tue Aug 26th, 2014 02:41 10th Post
I did wonder about that...

Eric, what do you think?

The attire doesn't always seem to be reacting to the environment in some of the scenes...



____________________
Robert.



Posted by Kathy Baker: Tue Aug 26th, 2014 09:26 11th Post
 The elephant shot seemed strange to me but the rest seem real enough. The elephant pic could have been shot at a wild animal park with a trained elephant just for tourist photo purposes. The others all seem to have wet or wind blown dresses or hair in all the right places.



Posted by amazing50: Wed Aug 27th, 2014 02:44 12th Post
Two of the shots have lightening strikes in just the right places at just the right time and then to have no flinching by the couples seems a bit much.
It's hard enough to get a bolt any where on a frame once in a while.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by jk: Wed Aug 27th, 2014 14:22 13th Post
amazing50 wrote: Two of the shots have lightening strikes in just the right places at just the right time and then to have no flinching by the couples seems a bit much.
It's hard enough to get a bolt any where on a frame once in a while.

I'm thinking that as you said this is big Photoshop or green screen use!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Eric: Thu Aug 28th, 2014 16:35 14th Post
Robert wrote:
I did wonder about that...

Eric, what do you think?

The attire doesn't always seem to be reacting to the environment in some of the scenes...

My vote would be......

1 Genuine
2 Wooden elephant statue
3 Genuine
4 Think it's a combination....grass looks odd round trousers??
5 Genuine
6 Why would you do this? Combo IMHO
7 - 10 Genuine
11 Think it's a combination. Having taken autocross shots ...too hard to script....too easy to combine!
12 Think it's a poor execution of a background replacement
13 Genuine
14 Obviously digitally manipulated ...Exposure of water highlights over 1stop less than dress!!
15 Genuine
16 Genuine

For me its more about the things that HAVENT been edited that suggest to me those images are genuine. For example, no one would leave a skyscraper coming out of the brides head (no 1) if they were adding a skyline.

And...The tornado shot...why didn't he clone the road over those grey bands that break up the strong line to the horizon? So again I think this is genuine...or limited creativity.


A lot of the couples have been worked on ...so this gives the slightly over done, unreal different exposure, compared to the backgrounds.





____________________
Eric


Posted by Judith: Sun Aug 31st, 2014 03:12 15th Post
Eric, I've seen no.6 before and it's genuine. Here is the news story:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/06/10/celebrating-spark-wildfire-provides-epic-wedding-photo-in-oregon/

More smoky shots here: http://joshnewton.pass.us/aprilandmichael/



Posted by richw: Tue Sep 2nd, 2014 23:32 16th Post
Somewhere like Darwin at the right time of year you could pretty much gaurentee lightning. A wedding photographer there would just need a cheap lightening trigger to get the shot, flinching would come a bit later with the thunder.

Someone shooting weddings up there might have quite a portfolio to pick the best from for this collection.



Posted by Judith: Tue Sep 9th, 2014 06:15 17th Post
I just saw JK and Robert's OCD confessions above about fuel logs. The pair of you need to get out more!!! And, Robert, you need to find a hobby.lol Every receipt since 1984?!



Posted by jk: Tue Sep 9th, 2014 07:21 18th Post
Judith wrote:
I just saw JK and Robert's OCD confessions above about fuel logs. The pair of you need to get out more!!! And, Robert, you need to find a hobby.lol Every receipt since 1984?!
I have been trying to but I need a make-up artist and stylist. ;-)



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1085  
Nikon DSLR Forums > Totally Off Topic Stuff > Everything Else > wedding photos Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1304 seconds (85% database + 15% PHP). 127 queries executed.