Moderated by: chrisbet,
Sony Bridge Camera DSC-RX10Amazing quality results from a compact camera!  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost

Posted by Graham Whistler: Sun Apr 20th, 2014 05:56 1st Post
I have just replaced my little Sony RX100 M2 that was far too small and as a serious DSLR user I could not get to grips with holding and composing pictures, with the new larger Sony DSC-RX10 bridge camera. The test picture attached is of Titchfield Abbey my local test subject.

I am amazed with the quality of the electronic viewfinder and it works with the ease of a high quality DSLR, but much smaller and very suitable for overseas air travel when the size of my bag full of Nikon D800 and lenses would get in the way of a family holiday!

The Zeiss 35mm equivalent 24-200mm f2.8 lens is very sharp and with Exmor CMOS 20.9 MP chip and built in steady shot there is no need for interchangable lenses. It has pro level weather sealing and all shooting options any serious photographer could need. The full HD AVCHD Movie mode also is easy to use with good sound and the sready shot gives well usable movie with hand holding. The auto focus and electronic zoom are also very good for movie!

Comparing first test results with pix from my D300 I would say they are as good if not better and exhibition quality A3 plus prints are no problem. On Monday we are off to Amsterdam for a few day so I will report back with more info when I get back. (Another D800 friend of mine also has one and is so pleased with it talked me into getting one.)

Attachment: Abbey0079S.jpg (Downloaded 113 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Eric: Sun Apr 20th, 2014 15:06 2nd Post
Once you step outside of the Nikon/Canon systems world you are likely to find some excellent cameras. The Fuji X system is rapidly becoming my choice for most non commercial work. ( customers still need reassuring with a big DSLR on a tripod. LOL)

Look forward to seeing more examples.



____________________
Eric


Posted by Graham Whistler: Sun Apr 20th, 2014 18:03 3rd Post
I will still make plenty of use of the D800, horses for courses!

This pix with the little Sony shows how good the dynamic range is.

Attachment: Abbey0085S.jpg (Downloaded 109 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by amazing50: Tue Apr 22nd, 2014 22:49 4th Post
Graham, I was checking out your camera and came across a Nikon P520 on sale as a dealer demo model.

Checked it out and it has almost everything I want in a travel camera such as GPS, WiFi, 20 sec voice memo record, lots of zoom - 24-1000 etc.

It didn't even put much of a dint my credit card ;~).

It's been a bit of fun setting it up and trying all the settings. Hi ISO is poor but it can take a series of night pix and combine them for a sharper effect.

Low ISO quality is quite good. Printed a 16x20 and was pleased.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by jk: Wed Apr 23rd, 2014 12:29 5th Post
I have the Nikon P510 which produces very good images for the small sensor size.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by amazing50: Wed Apr 23rd, 2014 16:59 6th Post
The P510 is almost identical to the P520, Just a few pixels difference, probably not enough to notice in prints.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by amazing50: Wed Apr 30th, 2014 16:34 7th Post
The zoom and anti vibration seem to work well but I find it slow focusing and saving shots.

The squirrel was a bit further than 10m at 1/150sec handheld. The full size pic is quite sharp.


Attachment: P520 Size comparison_cr2_cr.jpg (Downloaded 93 times)



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by Graham Whistler: Fri May 2nd, 2014 02:48 8th Post
Just had 7 days holiday in Amsterdam and the Sony did all I wanted pixs of the flowers were very sharp colour good and well up to Nikon D300 standard. Also shot some AVCHD movie with it and steady cam works well and even sound from the little camera works well.

There is no way I would turn up for a client to do a pro job with it. For serious photography will always use my D800 but for holiday pix you need a much smaller camera that is going to produce a good quality A3 print for use at the local camera club. The DX10 has a very good Zeiss 24-200 f2.8 lens lens and the results are hard to fault.

It worries me a bit posting this on a Nikon forum!

Attachment: Amsterdam0147.jpg (Downloaded 90 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by jk: Fri May 2nd, 2014 03:58 9th Post
No worries about the Sony photos. Nikon use Sony made sensors!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Graham Whistler: Fri May 2nd, 2014 04:47 10th Post
It also is good and sharp for macro work!

Attachment: Amsterdam0109.jpg (Downloaded 89 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by amazing50: Sat May 10th, 2014 02:59 11th Post
Flying over Sunday to Nuremberg via Amsterdam. Shooting an Al Di Meola (Jazz) concert in Nuremberg and then going to Valencia for a short stay.
Since my D600 is still in for a new shutter I'll be trying out the Coolpix p520 as a travel camera.
Will probably be using a Panasonic GH4 with 4K for the shoot.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by Eric: Sun May 11th, 2014 02:51 12th Post
Graham Whistler wrote:
It also is good and sharp for macro work!
That's a lovely sharp image, Graham.

Got me thinking again about this whole Nikon alternatives subject.

These type of 'all in one' cameras were considered inferior to DSLRs once upon a time. But the quality bar has now been seriously lifted!



____________________
Eric


Posted by Graham Whistler: Sun May 11th, 2014 07:13 13th Post
Eric I tried several during last year and traded them all back, this one is streets above all that I tried. It has simple controls and can be used just like a DSLR on M S A or P on any settings you need. ISO can be set or Auto and colour bal like -wise, but to date auto works fine on out doors. You can not fault the lens sharpness and I now think results are even better than I was getting with my D300 with 18-200 AFS my old well tried compact travel choice.Size is reduced but not by so much that you can not hold it or compose a picture. The eye level viewfinder is sharp and works well.



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Eric: Sun May 11th, 2014 08:05 14th Post
Graham Whistler wrote:
Eric I tried several during last year and traded them all back, this one is streets above all that I tried. It has simple controls and can be used just like a DSLR on M S A or P on any settings you need. ISO can be set or Auto and colour bal like -wise, but to date auto works fine on out doors. You can not fault the lens sharpness and I now think results are even better than I was getting with my D300 with 18-200 AFS my old well tried compact travel choice.Size is reduced but not by so much that you can not hold it or compose a picture. The eye level viewfinder is sharp and works well.
My wife has been on at me to get such a camera so she can use it as well. She doesn't 'get on' with the Fuji system.

But I am loving the new Fuji XT. Just got a shot of a Nightingale singing! These elusive critters sing from deep in the bushes so you normally can't snap them. But this chap saw me, flew to a higher perch gave a couple of trills before flying off. But the Fuji grabbed him in mid trill.

So it will be hard to part with this system as a travel kit ...especially after converting the XE body to IR, to share the lenses.



____________________
Eric


Posted by jk: Sun May 11th, 2014 16:16 15th Post
Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:
Eric I tried several during last year and traded them all back, this one is streets above all that I tried. It has simple controls and can be used just like a DSLR on M S A or P on any settings you need. ISO can be set or Auto and colour bal like -wise, but to date auto works fine on out doors. You can not fault the lens sharpness and I now think results are even better than I was getting with my D300 with 18-200 AFS my old well tried compact travel choice.Size is reduced but not by so much that you can not hold it or compose a picture. The eye level viewfinder is sharp and works well.
My wife has been on at me to get such a camera so she can use it as well. She doesn't 'get on' with the Fuji system.

But I am loving the new Fuji XT. Just got a shot of a Nightingale singing! These elusive critters sing from deep in the bushes so you normally can't snap them. But this chap saw me, flew to a higher perch gave a couple of trills before flying off. But the Fuji grabbed him in mid trill.

So it will be hard to part with this system as a travel kit ...especially after converting the XE body to IR, to share the lenses.

Glad you are enjoying the XT1.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Graham Whistler: Wed Jun 4th, 2014 17:58 16th Post
The Sony RX10 is also amazing good in poor avail;able light. This pix in the Beaulieu Motor Museum was in quite dull lighting so I used 1600 ISU. Lens at 8.8mm (as 35mm 24mm) fully wide hand held 1/125sec f6.3.

Attachment: Beauulieu0073.jpg (Downloaded 55 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Graham Whistler: Wed Jun 4th, 2014 18:07 17th Post
Another close-up from our garden this time. Depth of field is great with lens at 25mm (69mm in 35mm) 1/160 f5.6 ISO 400 hand held. Shots like this are easy!

Attachment: Poppy0025s.jpg (Downloaded 55 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by jk: Thu Jun 5th, 2014 03:30 18th Post
Very nice Graham.
But you forget that the cameras are all pretty good the real variable is the operator. Not all of us are as skilled, talented or experienced as you are. ;-)



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Graham Whistler: Thu Jun 5th, 2014 05:23 19th Post
Thanks but I do think Nikon need to find a camera like this too or it will be short of money soon to develop a D400 or more important a D4X?



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by jk: Thu Jun 5th, 2014 06:02 20th Post
I think the new D4S lacks much new to tempt people from canon to Nikon or for a Nikon user to upgrade.

I have been analysing the situation ever since the D800 has been in my hands.
I dont need more MP than 24MP, the D800 with 36MP is fine if you are trying to not purchase a medium format upgrade such as the Pentax 645, Hasselblad H5, Leica S2, etc. But I dont personally need that.

The D600/610 are perfect as they are 24MPbut still have good high ISO performance. In fact much the same as the D3S but with more MP if you need it for the cropping.
That said my D3S is still very good and works well for me except on those occasions when I need to have a cropped section.

My Fuji XT1 is what I want from a Nikon D400. It is small, high performance except the AF which is still less than the speed of a DSLR. If Nikon dont want to use a EVF then I appreciate that the camera needs to be bigger to fit in an optical viewfinder from a conventional DSLR.
As far as MP goes I think once again 24MP is perfect.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Graham Whistler: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 06:14 21st Post
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Eric: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 15:39 22nd Post
Graham Whistler wrote:
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.

For a long time I used a good compact camera for macro work precisely because the smaller sensor gave greater depth of field...and frankly adequate images compared to my DSLR.

My wife takes flower macro shots on her video camera, specifically because of the margin for focus error she gets with the enhanced dof of these even smaller sensors.



____________________
Eric


Posted by Robert: Fri Jun 6th, 2014 16:44 23rd Post
Funny that...

Occasionally I even go to the extent of using my 300 f2.8 wide open to reduce the DoF, I usually seek to isolate the flower from it's surroundings which sometimes requires a short DoF.

o.O


Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.

For a long time I used a good compact camera for macro work precisely because the smaller sensor gave greater depth of field...and frankly adequate images compared to my DSLR.

My wife takes flower macro shots on her video camera, specifically because of the margin for focus error she gets with the enhanced dof of these even smaller sensors.



____________________
Robert.



Posted by Eric: Sat Jun 7th, 2014 03:46 24th Post
Surroundings yes...but I prefer to see whole blooms in focus rather than a couple of petals. That needed f8-11 on the D3/105mm. With DX and compact size sensors that could go to f5.6.



Robert wrote:
Funny that...

Occasionally I even go to the extent of using my 300 f2.8 wide open to reduce the DoF, I usually seek to isolate the flower from it's surroundings which sometimes requires a short DoF.

o.O


Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:
I am finding that the Sony RX10 is also filling the gap left by (the bad move) I made trading in my D300 & 18-200 DX lens when I got my D800.

The above flower pix is amazing quality from the Sony and part of the reason is the Zeiss lens is pin sharp even at f2.8 but also macro photography as we know is very hard to get enough depth of field. The depth is amazing in this pix but the 8.8mm lens is a great help and f5.6 is giving all you need. With my Nikon D800 and 105mm Macro lens I would have needed to use f22 or f16 for the same shot!

I think Sony have been able to do a lot of R&D development work with small CMOS chips in their very high quality pro and high end pro/am range of camcorders. They are now using this in the new range of compact and DSLR still cameras.

For a long time I used a good compact camera for macro work precisely because the smaller sensor gave greater depth of field...and frankly adequate images compared to my DSLR.

My wife takes flower macro shots on her video camera, specifically because of the margin for focus error she gets with the enhanced dof of these even smaller sensors.



____________________
Eric


Posted by Graham Whistler: Sat Jun 7th, 2014 04:47 25th Post
I am off to S France on holiday next week and will take the Sony with me it will do all I need and any good pix will give me a pin sharp A3 prints for my local camera club! Hope to post a few images when I get back.



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Graham Whistler: Sun Jun 8th, 2014 18:22 26th Post
The Sony,s chip is quite small at 13.2x8.8mm but this still gives 20.9 Megapixels and produces images like this!

Attachment: PoppySeed0110.jpg (Downloaded 57 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Graham Whistler: Mon Jun 9th, 2014 05:17 27th Post
Other info for above: 1/320 sec (windy day but full sun) f7.1 at 47.9mm (in 35mm 130mm) ISO 200 image size 5472X3648. Exposure with this camera: matrix meter is spot on 99% of time. This pix is almost as shot but some unsharp mask was used. Auto focus was aimed 1/3 way in. At A3+ image is pin sharp and I would be hard pressed to see a better print from any Nikon DSLR!

Sorry to go on about this but this is very much what is going on with new lower end cameras today.



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by amazing50: Sat Jun 14th, 2014 01:28 28th Post
Looks like Sony has company ;~)

http://www.gearophile.com/newsviews/1-is-the-new-bottom.html



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace


Posted by jk: Sat Jun 14th, 2014 04:14 29th Post
Here is the new Panasonic DMC FZ1000 info from DPReview.

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz1000?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=features&utm_medium=sidebar-block-Homepage&ref=features



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Graham Whistler: Wed Jun 25th, 2014 12:56 30th Post
I am enjoying some very good weather in Provence in the South of France. The little Sony is doing well but you will be pleased to hear I am also using the D800. This view of the dramatic Nesque Gorge is with the Sony at full wide the depth of field is very good.

Attachment: Nesque0154s.jpg (Downloaded 40 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Graham Whistler: Wed Jun 25th, 2014 13:00 31st Post
This was taked last week also with the RX10 and the lavender was not quite at it's best so after last nights thunder hope we will have good weather and I will have a final go tomorrow before returning to UK.

JK many thanks for resetting my password!

Attachment: Lavender0172.jpg (Downloaded 40 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Eric: Wed Jun 25th, 2014 17:52 32nd Post
Graham Whistler wrote:
I am enjoying some very good weather in Provence in the South of France. The little Sony is doing well but you will be pleased to hear I am also using the D800. This view of the dramatic Nesque Gorge is with the Sony at full wide the depth of field is very good.
Suspect I stood on that very spot, Graham, last year!!

Lovely area, and lovely shot.



____________________
Eric


Posted by jk: Thu Jun 26th, 2014 03:37 33rd Post
Great news that you have found the lavender fields :-)

What the camera does not capture is the wonderful smell.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none


Posted by Graham Whistler: Thu Jun 26th, 2014 04:00 34th Post
Felt guilty with all these Sony pix so here is Gordes with the D800 and 24-70 AF-S lens!

Today weather is great so am off with cameras to lavender and sunflower fields. Packing up day tomorrow and start long drive back on Saturday.

Attachment: Gordes3979.jpg (Downloaded 35 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Graham Whistler: Thu Jun 26th, 2014 16:12 35th Post
This is a Sony pix from the local market. I doubt if you would get much better with a set-up in the studio this snap took less than 30 sec hand held! All it needed was a bit of unsharp mask in Photoshop.

Attachment: Garlic0178.jpg (Downloaded 32 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by Graham Whistler: Fri Jan 30th, 2015 18:02 36th Post
Another image from Islay this misty sea scape was lwith the Sony RX10 again!

Attachment: SeaMist.jpg (Downloaded 17 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler


Posted by jk: Sun Feb 1st, 2015 04:58 37th Post
Nice shot Graham.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 942  
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Other Makes of Camera > Sony Bridge Camera DSC-RX10 Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondsl.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2024 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0976 seconds (73% database + 27% PHP). 227 queries executed.