| Joined: | Mon Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| Location: | Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 6880 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
jk wrote:
ACR should be a stand alone chargeable product.
Isn't that basically Lightroom?
Not as I see it.
I dont want the features of Lightroom only the RAW conversion to allow me to edit a TIFF or JPG in the Photoshop version of my preference.
I find Lightroom interface to be very clunky. Maybe this is done to protect the innocent so they dont inadvertently edit images!
I cannot for the life of me understand why I need to change modules from Library to Develop to do some small changes to an image (sharpening, curves, spotting). It is just poor interface design as it slows down the process of editing whilst cataloguing.
I think that ACR should be charged at £40-£50 per version. So I should be able to use ACR v23 with Photoshop 7 or ACR v20 with CS6 if that is what I want.
____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none