| Joined: | Sat Apr 14th, 2012 |
| Location: | Scotland, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 325 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I hear so many people talk about post capture manipulation not being 'real photography', I wonder if the converted camera mob will draw the same comparison with IR?
Personally I stopped bothering about these 'differences' soon after getting my first digital camera. In fact my business slogan was 'creating a better image'. Whilst it was aimed at improving companies product and presentation appearance, the double meaning was always there.
Have always subscribed to the belief that 'inside every good photo, there is a great image waiting to be released'.
I agree. I'm fed up listening to people looking down their noses at the mere mention of Photoshop, as if you are somehow "cheating". I see it as part of the arty farty process of arriving at the final image and at the end of the day, it's what it looks like that matters not how you got there. So, they can continue looking down their snotty noses for all I care. I just see them as lazy for not learning how to apply the finishing touches to their pics.
Have downloaded the xmp file. Looks interesting.