View single post by whiteiris
 Posted: Wed Apr 18th, 2012 17:53
whiteiris

 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status: 
Offline
I was underwhelmed with the 105 contrast and prefer the humble 60mm.


Constable wrote:
Sorry, came to this thread late.

The sigma 150 and 180macro are very good optically. The 180 has (at least in my example) crap build quality.. after two years (and I suppose some 30'000 shots to be fair) the polymer coating is peeling off. I fully agree this is a probably consequence of a combination of sun protection and insect repellant, but nevertheless!

The new sigma 180 2.8 looks interesting, but is still fantasy-ware.

The Nikon 105 is a trusty favourite ... you cannot go wrong with it but I find the results lack a little something (probably skill on my part).

I still like the zeiss 100 if you can live with MF (and for macro it is a fact of life).

This is with the Sigma 180, f9, 1/640 on the D4 and heavily cropped.

Ed