| Joined: | Tue Apr 17th, 2012 |
| Location: | Netherlands |
| Posts: | 196 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
you are right about the 16-35 being full-frame.
Have you seen Ken's remards on distortion at the wide end? (Spectacular!, I have fisheye lenses with less distortion :-O)
I would rather consider the older 17-35 2.8 af-s lens.
Note the 17-35 can be made compatible with almost any Nikon SLR camera, by adding a meter-coupling-prong.
Regards, Gilbert
Last edited on Wed Apr 18th, 2012 10:57 by Gilbert Sandberg