View single post by jk
 Posted: Sat Apr 14th, 2012 13:32
jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6874
Status: 
Offline
I was discussing with Rich Whetton and he mentioned he needed a wider wideangle.
I immediately thought of the Nikon 14-24 f2.8 but then the 16-35mm f4 sprung to mind but initially I though no that is a DX lens but in fact it is an FX lens.

I know I dont like Ken Rockwell's style of reporting but......
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/16-35mm.htm

Seems like a great lens and it takes a 77mm filter. The Nikon 14-24 cannot use a filter as its front element is so curved.
Seems to me the 16-35mm has everything going for it.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none