| Joined: | Thu Apr 12th, 2012 |
| Location: | Denham, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 293 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Can't say it excites me. No weight saving as such. I think if I had the money it would be a D6 for me.
Me too. The Z9 is actually 160g HEAVIER than a D4 based on what I have read so far.
Replacing two D4 bodies, 24-70 f2.8 and 70-200 f2.8 with the mirrorless equivalents would increase the weight by 75g. I would also need to buy a new computer to cope with the increased file sizes. Net benefit, for me zero. I can get two used D5 bodies for less than the cost of a single Z9. Somebody please remind me again of the benefits of mirrorless technology.
Last edited on Fri Oct 29th, 2021 12:38 by GeoffR