| Joined: | Mon Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| Location: | Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 6874 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I guess the images were high quality in the context that they were taken on a tool with limitations.
I dont know the criteria for their assessment as I believe like most of these assessments are somewhat subjective. I guess they must use the same criteria as for other submissions made by candidates using superior tools.
One thing that I will say is that RPS does have a consistently high quality process and criteria unlike that demonstrated in the past by some/many of the Southern Counties Photographic Federation judges. When I joined my first photography club (Beckenham) I attended several competitions and was astounded by the poor standard of judging (favouritism, parochial commenting, stilted assessment). It put me off participating in any club for the next 30 years, instead I had my images judged by my clients and customers.
____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none