View single post by Robert | ||||||||||
Posted: Wed Mar 13th, 2019 04:50 |
|
|||||||||
Robert![]()
![]() |
Here are the results of my tests yesterday: Firstly a general full D800 frame view of the target at 300mm, distance to spire approx 5 miles. I have added two spots to each image to help track the movement more easily. On some images the spots are a bit of a guess, but not very far out of position. ![]() and a 100% crop: ![]() This is the StarStacker grouping of the control cluster, camera stationary, well wobbling a bit, but not being moved by the motor! 18 exposures, again 100% crop. ![]() This is the StarStacker cluster of the ascending set, 34 exposures with the camera being raised by the motor without a counterbalance, ideally all the dots should be in exactly the same place. ![]() This is the StarStacker cluster of the descending set, 31 exposures with the camera being lowered by the motor without a counterbalance, it doesn't seem to show any signs of running more quickly than the ascending set. ![]() These images are stacked with the frame fixed but revealing each layered image and the differences between the images is visible. Bear in mind a 50mph wind was blowing at the time, the camera was being buffeted badly . Quite obviously the test needs repeating without the gales, but at least I now know I can adjust the polar scope and it's better than it was. There is no longer a tracking error pattern.
____________________ Robert. |
|||||||||
|