| Joined: | Mon Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| Location: | South Lakeland, UK |
| Posts: | 4066 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Robert wrote:
But Grahams Kingfisher photo with the fish in it's beak might have been OK? That's nature?
Unless it's some sort of pacifist organisation then that's what you get with nature, they don't have table manners, they lead a life of survival by whatever means they have evolved to use, or die?
Kingfisher with a fish was fine.
There's no justice.
____________________
Robert.