| Joined: | Thu Apr 19th, 2012 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 4424 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Eric wrote:
Incidentally I already have the 70-300 (which is a very competent little lens by the way).
Do you use it instead of the 80-200 f2.8 in less demanding circumstances?
I have the 18-35, 24-120 and the 80-200 f2.8, I feel that 200mm is a bit short on FX. The three lenses together would give me good coverage with useful overlap. AND effectively 450mm on DX if I need it, without the expense and bulk of a 500mm lens.
Haven't used it since I got rid of the D7000.
You are welcome to borrow it and do your own evaluation.
____________________
Eric