View single post by Iain | ||||||||||
Posted: Wed Jun 1st, 2016 10:40 |
|
|||||||||
Iain
|
I should also have said that the reason for me going for the 200-500 was I missed too many shots as things came too close and I couldn't move. So it was either two camera bodies with a prime on one and a 80-200 on the other or the 200-500.
|
|||||||||
|