| Joined: | Mon Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| Location: | Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 6874 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I think most of the shoots will be landscape with only occasional buildings and not for commercial purposes.
I am just wondering if it is better to stick with the bigger zoom, i.e. the 12-24 because I am more likely to use this for more subjects, and so it might end up living on the camera, whereas the 11-16 will be so wide and limited to being that wide, that it become very specific to sweeping landscapes?
Is the image quality difference so much? I have looked on flickr groups and pbase. But its seems to be six of one and half a dozen of the other again.
I think the 12-24 mm (18-35mm FX) is a much more useful lens.
For me the best utility lens I have is the Nikon 35-105 f3.5-5.6 (FX) or 28-105 f3.5-5.6 (FX). The 35-105 is very small for its quality and range.
I still have a Sigma 24-60 f2.8 zoom that I had before I got the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 AFS, I use it when I need a smaller lighter setup.
____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none