| Joined: | Mon Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| Location: | Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 6874 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Eric wrote:
Graham Whistler wrote:
So, are you saying that the old wisdom of ...the smaller the pixels, the poorer the low light quality....is still correct?
I think it's more involved than just pixel size, processors and software do a lot more now days.
Look at the D1, huge pixels but poor hi ISO.
I agree it is more than just the sensor (12MP v. 16MP v 21MP) and its pixel size and the support electronics (EXPEED version 3, 4, 5) as the the software also comes into play.
This is exemplified with the Fuji X series cameras all the same sensor (more or less). Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop ACR still cant beat the solutions offered in other RAW softwares.
____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none